Room on Fire

by

The Strokes

Edit

Look, I saw Television live in the seventies (as well as the nineties and in 2001), caught Iggy Pop, the Buzzcocks, the Feelies, Eleventh Dream Day, the Mekons, the Replacements, the Pixies, the dB's, Pere Ubu, Yo La Tenga, and a host of other indie, alternative, and punk acts at their peak. Although I didn't catch them live, I discovered Big Star a lot earlier than most, and the same with Richard Thompson (who I have seen often in the past twenty years). I think my indie credibility is intact. I am baffled by the negative reactions that these guys inexplicably generate. I personally consider them to be the best band to come out of New York since Television (qualification: on record; though they weren't a good studio band, the Feelies were as good live as anyone I have ever seen). No, they aren't as good and are definitely not as brilliant as Tom Verlaine and Co., but they are still one of the most gripping new bands of the past few years in my opinion.

So why do so many people hate the Strokes? I think the explanation is simple: they were overhyped. Or if not overhyped, hyped to a degree that many people found objectionable. I only gave their first album a listen after being put off by the absurd overreaction to their debut. Once I gave them a try, however, I was stunned and delighted at what a delightful and exciting band they were.

I liked this second album an awful lot even on first listen, but upon repeated listenings, I have come to like it as much as the first album. It starts off great with some enormously catchy songs in "What Ever Happened?" and "Reptilia," but then does something extraordinary: it gets better! "12:51" and "You Talk Way Too Much" are among the best songs they have ever done, and "Under Control" (with its Television-like guitar lines) and "The End Has No End" later on are just as good. I love the tightness of the band, and the delightful guitar work that adorns each cut. I have never seen the Strokes live, so I don't know who of the two guitarists is responsible for what, but there is some truly superb guitar work on this album, with the guitars often playing their own gorgeous melodies in contrast to the central vocals. No, the guitar work isn't as breathtaking as when Tom Verlaine and Richard Lloyd would battle it out in Television, but it is still quite superb.

I think it is great to be discriminating. And it is important to resist mere record company hype. But it is also important to give a band its due, and this is a crackerjack band, with great songs and tight musicianship. And now, after a great sophomore effort, I'm definitely looking forward to their third album.

The same people that attempt to slice apart the Strokes by virtue of their 'unworthy' comparisons are the same individuals that are destroying rock and roll. Christ, the Strokes are rock and roll. When was the last time anyone heard anything so immediately accessible but also so intricately crafted and subtle? It's really simple. Either you like the music, or you don't. It's not incredibly important whether they sound like Television or the Stooges, or whatever. Who cares. How many people refuse to listen to the Byrds because they lifted some bluegrass melodies? It's good music, plain and simple and this is evident from the fact that the last mixtape I made had Rolling Stones, Strokes and Velvet Underground side by side. Yea, they do sound like that era, but that's a GOOD THING.